You claim Bezos' net worth is undeserved.
His money employs 1M people directly and many more indirectly, the majority of those are well paid.
So let's say you take all his assets and equity and money and divide it up, even just amongst his employees, now you have a bunch of people with just under $190k in the bank, barely enough to buy a nice house, but in the process you made those people unemployed. Because his money is not in the bank, his money is tied up in Amazon and if Amazon needs to liquidate assets to pay off some socialist redistribution scheme, it ceases to exist.
Bezos is worth $185B, sure but he doesn't have $185B in the bank, he maybe has $100M in 'cash'. Still nice, but nowhere near enough to simply take and redistribute. ~$62.06B of the value (according to Wikipedia) of Amazon is equity (a form of debt).
Okay you say, then let's raise taxes on Amazon so a part of that revenue goes back. How much you ask? 8%, that's a nice number, it's the sales tax for a lot of states. Okay, but you already collected the sales tax, so this is another tax on what they already paid taxes on. But sure, every $ they make, collect 8c. Amazon currently has a profit margin of just under 2%. That means they'd have to liquidate 6% of the company every year to pay these extra taxes or raise the prices which makes them less competitive and thus makes them go out of business faster.
Every company eventually goes out of business, taxes simply accelerate that process by siphoning off money. And for what really? Back in the day people made 25c/h in 1929 - or $3.84/h adjusted for inflation. People at the lowest ends of the income pool now make $15/h on average. They got 5x richer compared to 100 years ago, basically an American at minimum wage should have a living standard of the average middle-class American - AND THEY DO! What poor folk were able to afford cars and phones back in the day? How is giving more money going to help them in any way?